The much anticipated Signapore Night Race took place just a few days ago in Singapore. This was the world's first ever Forumula 1 race event to take place at night and let me tell you, the lighting was spectacular.
The much anticipated Signapore Night Race took place just a few days ago in Singapore. This was the world's first ever Forumula 1 race event to take place at night and let me tell you, the lighting was spectacular.
Not so long ago, the US apparently invaded Pakistani soil while chasing after O-Sam and his Bearded Brigade. Entering a country without any prior permission, especially for a 'war' that Pakistan, under General Musharraf's rule, was to be fighting themselves within their borders. The US was only supposed to be offering financial aid.


If there's a case to be made against democracy, few countries make it better than Pakistan.
On Saturday, Pakistani legislators will elect a new president to replace Pervez Musharraf, the general-turned-strongman who resigned the office last month.
In one corner there is Mushahid Hussain Sayed, a former journalist and one-time political prisoner of Mr. Musharraf who is nonetheless running as the candidate of the general's old party. Mr. Mushahid, probably the best of the bunch, stands next to no chance of winning.
In another corner there is Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, candidate of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's party. Mr. Sharif -- whose record includes bankrupting his country, presiding over a disastrous military campaign against India, and attempting to implement Sharia law while awarding himself near-dictatorial powers -- has made it clear he intends to gut the powers of the presidency should he return to office.
And then there is Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of slain former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and leader of the Pakistan People's Party. Mr. Zardari, who has compared himself to Jesus (an innocent accused of crimes he did not commit), is easily one of the most notorious figures in the long parade of horribles that make up the country's political history. He is, of course, expected to win Saturday's ballot handily.
Just how bad is Mr. Zardari? It would be a relief if it were true that he was merely suffering from dementia, a diagnosis offered by two New York psychiatrists last year. But that diagnosis seems to have been produced mainly with a view toward defending himself against corruption charges in a British court.
Mr. Zardari -- who earned the moniker "Mr. 10%" for allegedly demanding kickbacks during his wife's two terms in office -- has long been dogged by accusations of corruption. In 2003, a Swiss magistrate found him and Mrs. Bhutto guilty of laundering $10 million. Mr. Zardari has admitted to owning a 355-acre estate near London, despite coming from a family of relatively modest means and reporting little income at the time it was purchased. A 1998 report by the New York Times's John Burns suggests he may have made off with as much as $1.5 billion in kickbacks. This was at a time when his wife was piously claiming to represent the interests of Pakistan's impoverished masses and denouncing corrupt leaders who "leave the cupboard bare."
It's an open question whether Mr. Zardari will be more or less restrained in his behavior if he's elected: His return to politics has meant the dropping of all charges against him and the release of millions in frozen assets. (The presidency will also confer legal immunity.) That may make him one of the few men in Pakistan to get richer this year: The economy, which grew in an unprecedented way under Mr. Musharraf, has tanked under civilian management. The Karachi stock exchange has lost about a third of its value and the currency about a fifth in recent months. Markets often have better memories than voters.
It's also an open question whether Pakistan's increasingly dire security outlook will focus Mr. Zardari's mind on the urgent tasks of governance. Mr. Zardari has sought to parley himself internationally as a pro-Western candidate, and maybe he is. Yet over the weekend the Pakistani government agreed to stop its air strikes on the Taliban, in exchange for which Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, a religious party, agreed to throw its support to Mr. Zardari. The Taliban has used previous cease-fires to regroup and re-arm for operations against both Afghanistan and Islamabad.
Then there is al Qaeda, now openly endeavoring to use its last redoubts in Pakistan to take over the country. Last month, Ayman al-Zawahiri issued a long broadcast (in English, no less) denouncing Mr. Musharraf as an American tool and calling on Pakistan's army to come over to his side.
That call was unlikely to be heeded against Mr. Musharraf, who could count on the loyalty of his troops. But Mr. Zardari is a caricature of everything that's morally bankrupt with the country's Westernized elite, and thus an inviting propaganda target for al Qaeda and the Taliban. It doesn't help, either, that they are working fertile political soil: 71% of Pakistanis oppose cooperating with the U.S. in counterterrorism, and 51% oppose fighting the Taliban at all, according to a June poll.
Al Qaeda and the Taliban feed on chaos, and a Zardari presidency will almost certainly provide more of it. For Pakistanis, this is a self-inflicted wound and a rebuke to their democracy. For the rest of world, it's a matter of hoping that Pakistan will somehow muddle through. For now, however, this looks like a Category 5 hurricane, dark and vast and visible just offshore.
Write to bstephens@wsj.com
Now, I haven't slept all night so I'm pretty wired so please excuse the profanity and random retardation.
First let's discuss Dr. Aafia Siddiqui. A woman who apparently wore a head scarf (oooooh be afraid, she might blow you up with her eyes). I'm reading a (in Daily Times 08/08/2008) an absurd reprint of article published about her in the Daily Times 2004 (the year Bucknell gave me a thumbs up) which honestly reads more like a low budget hollywood flick that obviously would never make it on screen, but then again water world did so I guess anything is possible. The author, a Mr. Khalid Hasan, who needs to take basic math (hint: if you are in the us, they have this show u can appear on - Are you smarter than a 5th grader - u see where I'm going?). Why am I pointing this out? Well he states she is 29 in his article on Nov 11, 2004. Her bday is March 2, 1972. So let's try baby steps...1972 + 30 = 2002 + 2 = 2004. So if her bday is correct and the date the article was published is correct, that makes her 32 when the article was published in 04. Mr Editor at DT needs to be careful editing these little details that apparently people ARE reading. The article goes on to highlight how her hubby, apparently more fundoo than Aafia, threatens to divorce her while she is abt to have their 3rd child, during which her father dies from hypertension causing a heart attack. She has her kid then goes to the US to find a job. The Feds claim she actually endured all the previous trauma to come all the way to the US to open a POBox for mail for some dude named Majid Khan, "a purported" baddy from the Al-Q school of thought. This is not a hit on the author, but a question to the FBI-are you guys on something? I mean, I've studied the funny things that have been cooked up in the past in college (in the US) and this is a potential cherry topping. Let the woman go! It takes five yrs for this to get light from our beloved global media, u obviously let something leak and feel bad and guilty so now you wanna slap some cuffs on her and take her to court for a bank job when she probably didn't even eat the free twinkies at her kids pta meetings.
Let's move on to Mushi-ma-main-man. I gotta say, I have always been a pretty diligent fan (pankha for all you pakkers) of his. I'm not afraid to say it since we are a democracy with free press, or are we? So he came to power by pushing Kadoo Bhaiyya out. Hey, its the law of the jungle, only the tough survive. You don't see the Rhinos filing suit against Simba the Lion, do you? Obviously something went wrong when we assumed to be more evolved than other animals. Did everyone just wake up one day with amnesia? Zardari and Nawaz are impeaching Mush, not some good guys we all love to see like Jan Rambo. These guys are like Mumra and his sidekick from Thundercats. They put on a happy face and its suddenly ok that they are blowing stories abt how bad Mush is? If you want my opinion, if Nawaz was still here instead of M-man, he would be king - the title he was looking for before getting the boot. His support was all the Mullah Members Association (MMA) we all love so, and he wanted Sharia as primary law. Am I the only one who recalls? I was only 18 but maybe its because hadn't started anything. Mush came in, he got Shaukat Aziz to come and do a pro bono gig as PM, got butt-loads of cash into Pakistan (aka FDI or Foreign Direct Investment) and now we have things like Hyatt Regency and Centaurus and Metro and Makro and booming Ibanking by JS et al and a whole host of other things that usually result from economic prosperity. Sure we weren't number one, but these days (a result of smiley and baldy) we are at par with Nigeria and Zimbabwe (who are at something like 1 million % inflation). The US warns people not to travel to Pak. This is a first in a while. Mush made Pak safer, trustworthy, investable (if there is such a word) and now more jobs than before 1998. Kids graduate from the US and come back to find great career opportunities. Rozee.pk becomes a success as a local monster.com, professional competition becomes something become seek, salaries allow people in their mid-twenties to affors their own clothes and phones and dinners with friends (at least those who earn honestly). Things were good. Now we want to pack our bags and get on the next flight to 'anywhere but here' departing asap from all gates.
Without going on too much because my thumbs hurt now and all the text was keyed in on a blackberry curve 8310 from mobilink - reshaping lives with reception all the way up in Santa's nose but none in my living room in ISB, I would like to discuss fuel prices and other things tied to inflation. Yes, its almost the same as putting air in a balloon. What the Fuck! 86 rupees for a litre??? In Saudi, the rate is $.15 or 15 cents and here its $1.22!!!! I know they produce it and all, but aren't we friends with them? Can't they help us cut down our prices just a notch? If not, then isn't the gop supposed to subsidize rather than tax the consumer more and more? So to finish this off, why do we the hard workers suffer when gop officials get unlimited fuel budgets that their spoilt kids are burning away in govt cars on joy rides with their buddies??
Ponder Pakistan, you are deserting your own country for quick gains that won't last your lifetime.
Remember, we don't inherit the world from our parents, we borrow it from our kids.
--
S. Zohare Haider
m: +92 300 5 777 222
instant.secure.payments
www.amaana.com